<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">radiology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Радиология — практика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Radiology - Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0118</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Центральный научно-исследовательский институт лучевой диагностики</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">radiology-38</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРОДОЛЖЕННОЕ МЕДИЦИНСКОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Возможности применения магнитно-резонансной томографии и позитронно-эмиссионной томографии с 18F-фтордезоксиглюкозой для диагностики рака молочной железы (обзор литературы и собственные клинические наблюдения)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron-Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Application for Breast Cancer Diagnosis (Literature Review with Case Reports)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гележе</surname><given-names>П. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gelezhe</surname><given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">Gelezhe.pavel@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морозов</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozov</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">npcmr@zdrav.mos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГБУЗ «Научно-практический центр медицинской радиологии Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Research and Practical Center of Medical Radiology of Moscow Healthcare Department</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gelezhe P.B., Morozov S.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.radp.ru/jour/article/view/38">https://www.radp.ru/jour/article/view/38</self-uri><abstract><p>Рак молочной железы является социально значимой медицинской проблемой во всем мире. Назначение оптимального плана лечения требует точного стадирования. Магнитно-резонансная томография (МРТ) и позитронно-эмиссионная томография (ПЭТ) достигли значительного прогресса в последние десятилетия, являясь клинически значимыми для различных стадий онкологического процесса. МРТ молочных желез обеспечивает высокую диагностическую точность для оценки местного распространения опухолевого процесса, МРТ всего тела с протоколом ДВИ позволяет выявить отдаленные метастазы. С другой стороны, ПЭТ с 18F-ФДГ, совмещенная с компьютерной томографией (КТ), также обладает высокими диагностическими качествами в обнаружении отдаленных метастазов. ПЭТ/МРТ является быстро развивающейся технологией, применение которой оправдано при необходимости одновременного получения данных о локальном статусе опухоли и ее метаболической активности. Тем не менее в настоящее время требуется больше клинических данных для демонстрации преимущества одновременного сбора данных. Продолжается оптимизация протоколов ПЭТ/МРТ, которая позволит повысить диагностическую точность при раке молочной железы. Данный обзор посвящен текущему состоянию вопроса применения МРТ и ПЭТ с 18F-ФДГ в диагностике рака молочной железы, путям развития методов и потенциальным областям применения в будущем.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Breast cancer is a socially significant medical problem all over the world. Optimal treatment plan requires precise staging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have made significant progress in recent decades, being clinically significant for various stages of the oncological process. MRI of the breast provides high diagnostic accuracy for local tumor evaluation. Whole-body DWI allows to identify distant metastases. On the other hand, PET with 18F-FDG, combined with computed tomography (CT), also has high diagnostic properties in the detection of distant metastases. PET/MRI is a rapidly developing technology, the use of which is justified when it is necessary to simultaneously obtain data on the local status of the tumor and its metabolic activity. However, more clinical data is now required to demonstrate the benefits of simultaneous data collection. The optimization of the PET/MRI protocols in breast cancer continues, which will increase the diagnostic accuracy. This review focuses on the current state of art in the field of using MRI and 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer, ways to develop the method and potential applications in the future.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансная томография молочных желез</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd><kwd>совмещенная с компьютерной томографией</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd><kwd>совмещенная с магнитно-резонансной томографией</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>18F-фтордезоксиглюкоза</kwd><kwd>Breast Cancer</kwd><kwd>Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging</kwd><kwd>Positron-Emission Tomography</kwd><kwd>Combined with Computer Tomography</kwd><kwd>18F-fluorodeoxyglucose</kwd><kwd>Positron-Emission Tomography</kwd><kwd>Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Appenzeller P., Mader C., Huellner M. et al. PET/CT versus body coil PET/MRI: How low can you go? // Insights Imaging. 2013. V. 4. № 4. P. 481-490.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Appenzeller P., Mader C., Huellner M. et al. PET/CT versus body coil PET/MRI: How low can you go? // Insights Imaging. 2013. V. 4. № 4. P. 481-490.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baba S., Isoda T., Maruoka Y. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging // J. Nucl. Med. 2014. V. 55. № 5. P. 736-742.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baba S., Isoda T., Maruoka Y. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging // J. Nucl. Med. 2014. V. 55. № 5. P. 736-742.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bellevre D., Blanc Fournier C., Switsers O. et al. Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with 18F-FDG/PET: How small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems? // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2014. V. 41. № 6. P. 1103-1112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bellevre D., Blanc Fournier C., Switsers O. et al. Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with 18F-FDG/PET: How small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems? // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2014. V. 41. № 6. P. 1103-1112.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandarana H., Heacock L., Rakheja R. et al. Pulmonary nodules in patients with primary malignancy: Comparison of hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT imaging // Radiol. 2013. V. 268. № 3. P. 874-881.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandarana H., Heacock L., Rakheja R. et al. Pulmonary nodules in patients with primary malignancy: Comparison of hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT imaging // Radiol. 2013. V. 268. № 3. P. 874-881.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dregely I., Lanz T., Metz S. et al. A 16-channel MR coil for simultaneous PET/MR imaging in breast cancer // Eur. Radiol. 2015. № 25. P. 1154-1161.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dregely I., Lanz T., Metz S. et al. A 16-channel MR coil for simultaneous PET/MR imaging in breast cancer // Eur. Radiol. 2015. № 25. P. 1154-1161.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duch J., Fuster D., Munoz M. et al. PET/CT with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose in the assessment of metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer // Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2012. V. 56. № 3. P. 291-298.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duch J., Fuster D., Munoz M. et al. PET/CT with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose in the assessment of metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer // Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2012. V. 56. № 3. P. 291-298.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garami Z., Hascsi Z., Varga J. et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012. V. 38. № 1. P. 31-37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garami Z., Hascsi Z., Varga J. et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012. V. 38. № 1. P. 31-37.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gradishar W., Anderson B., Blair S. et al. Breast cancer version 3.2014 // J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2014. V. 12. № 4. P. 542-590.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gradishar W., Anderson B., Blair S. et al. Breast cancer version 3.2014 // J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2014. V. 12. № 4. P. 542-590.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Groheux D., Espie M., Giacchetti S. et al. Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer // Radiol. 2013. V. 266. № 2. P. 388-405.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Groheux D., Espie M., Giacchetti S. et al. Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer // Radiol. 2013. V. 266. № 2. P. 388-405.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">He N., Xie C., Wei W. et al. A new, preoperative, MRI-based scoring system for diagnosing malignant axillary lymph nodes in women evaluated for breast cancer // Eur. J. Radiol. 2012. V. 81. № 10. P. 2602-2612.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">He N., Xie C., Wei W. et al. A new, preoperative, MRI-based scoring system for diagnosing malignant axillary lymph nodes in women evaluated for breast cancer // Eur. J. Radiol. 2012. V. 81. № 10. P. 2602-2612.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huellner M., Appenzeller P., Kuhn F. et al. Whole-body nonenhanced PET/MR versus PET/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: Preliminary observations // Radiol. 2014. V. 273. № 3. P. 859-869.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huellner M., Appenzeller P., Kuhn F. et al. Whole-body nonenhanced PET/MR versus PET/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: Preliminary observations // Radiol. 2014. V. 273. № 3. P. 859-869.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jambor I., Kuisma A., Ramadan S. et al. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1,5 T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial // Acta Oncol. 2015. Early Online. P. 1-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jambor I., Kuisma A., Ramadan S. et al. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1,5 T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial // Acta Oncol. 2015. Early Online. P. 1-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knuttel F., Menezes G., van den Bosch M. et al. Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast // J. Surg. Oncol. 2014. V. 110. № 1. P. 26-31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knuttel F., Menezes G., van den Bosch M. et al. Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast // J. Surg. Oncol. 2014. V. 110. № 1. P. 26-31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mainiero M., Lourenco A., Mahoney M. et al. ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening // J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2013. V. 10. № 1. P. 11-14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mainiero M., Lourenco A., Mahoney M. et al. ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening // J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2013. V. 10. № 1. P. 11-14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marinovich M., Houssami N., Macaskill P. et al. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy // J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2013. V. 105. № 5. P. 321-333.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marinovich M., Houssami N., Macaskill P. et al. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy // J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2013. V. 105. № 5. P. 321-333.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Menezes G., Knuttel F., Stehouwer B. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives // World J. Clin. Oncol. 2014. V. 5. № 2. P. 61-70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Menezes G., Knuttel F., Stehouwer B. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives // World J. Clin. Oncol. 2014. V. 5. № 2. P. 61-70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moy L., Noz M., Maguire G. Jr. et al. Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer // Breast J. 2010. V. 16. № 4. P. 369-376.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moy L., Noz M., Maguire G. Jr. et al. Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer // Breast J. 2010. V. 16. № 4. P. 369-376.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pace L., Nicolai E., Luongo A. et al. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. V. 83. № 2. P. 289-296.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pace L., Nicolai E., Luongo A. et al. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. V. 83. № 2. P. 289-296.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reiner C., Stolzmann P., Husmann L. et al. Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2014. V. 41. № 4. P. 649- 658.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reiner C., Stolzmann P., Husmann L. et al. Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2014. V. 41. № 4. P. 649- 658.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stolzmann P., Veit-Haibach P., Chuck N. et al. Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: Comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging // Invest. Radiol. 2013. V. 48. № 5. P. 241-246.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stolzmann P., Veit-Haibach P., Chuck N. et al. Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: Comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging // Invest. Radiol. 2013. V. 48. № 5. P. 241-246.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taneja S., Jena A., Goel R. et al. Simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: A pilot study // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. V. 83. P. 2231-2239.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taneja S., Jena A., Goel R. et al. Simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: A pilot study // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. V. 83. P. 2231-2239.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
