<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">radiology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Радиология — практика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Radiology - Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0118</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Центральный научно-исследовательский институт лучевой диагностики</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">radiology-74</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнение диагностической ценности диффузионно-взвешенной магнитно-резонансной томографии, позитронно-эмиссионной томографии с 18F-ФДГ и компьютерной томографии всего тела при метастатическом раке молочной железы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Whole-body MRI with Diffusion-weighted Images, 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Combined with Computer Tomography and Whole Body Computer Tomography in Metastatic Breast Cancer</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-2202</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гележе</surname><given-names>П. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gelezhe</surname><given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">gelezhe.pavel@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-6170</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морозов</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozov</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">npcmr@zdrav.mos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГБУЗ «Научно-практический клинический центр диагностики и телемедицинских технологий Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Research and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Healthcare of Moscow</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gelezhe P.B., Morozov S.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.radp.ru/jour/article/view/74">https://www.radp.ru/jour/article/view/74</self-uri><abstract><p>Рак молочной железы занимает лидирующие позиции в онкологической заболеваемости и смертности. Точное стадирование заболевания повышает шансы на высокую безрецидивную выживаемость. Позитронно-эмиссионная томография с 18F-фтордезоксиглюкозой (18F-ФДГ ПЭТ/КТ) считается «золотым стандартом» диагностики метастатического поражения при ряде онкологических заболеваний, в том числе и при раке молочной железы. Диффузионно-взвешенные изображения (ДВИ) являются специфической импульсной последовательностью, позволяющей дифференцировать злокачественный процесс за счет повышения сигнала. Место ДВИ всего тела в диагностическом алгоритме при раке молочной железы не определено. Целью работы являлась оценка возможностей ДВИ всего тела в сравнении с 18F-ФДГ ПЭТ/КТ и компьютерной томографией (КТ) всего тела в отношении местного и отдаленного распространения рака молочной железы. Было произведено сравнение диагностических показателей, включающих чувствительность, специфичность, положительное и отрицательное прогностическое значение, точность, для 18F-ФДГ ПЭТ/КТ, МРТ с ДВИ и КТ всего тела. МРТ всего тела с ДВИ продемонстрировала преимущество в диагностике метастатического поражения печени и скелета. Использование исключительно МРТ всего тела с ДВИ для стадирования и рестадирования рака молочной железы не является оправданным по причине низкой специфичности выявления метастазов регионарных и отдаленных лимфатических узлов. МРТ всего тела с ДВИ может быть рекомендована в качестве уточняющего метода после выполнения 18F-ФДГ ПЭТ/КТ или КТ всего тела.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Breast cancer occupies a leading position in cancer morbidity and mortality. Accurate staging of the disease increases the chances of a high relapse-free survival. 18F-FDG PET/CT is considered the «gold standard» for diagnosing metastatic lesions in a number of cancers, including breast cancer. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a specific pulse sequence that allows differentiation of the malignant process. The place of whole body DWI in the diagnostic algorithm for breast cancer is not defined. The aim of the work was to evaluate the possibilities of whole body DWI in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole body CT for the local and distant spread of breast cancer. A comparison was made of diagnostic indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, accuracy. A whole body MRI with DWI demonstrated an advantage in diagnosing metastatic lesions of the liver and skeleton. The use of exclusively whole body MRI with DWI for staging and restaging of breast cancer is not justified due to the low specificity of detection of metastases of regional and distant lymph nodes. A whole body MRI with DWI may be recommended as a clarifying method after performing 18F-FDG PET/CT or whole body CT.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансная томография</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd><kwd>компьютерная томография</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>18F-фтордезоксиглюкоза</kwd><kwd>Breast Cancer</kwd><kwd>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</kwd><kwd>Positron Emission Tomography</kwd><kwd>Computed Tomography</kwd><kwd>18F-fluorodeoxyglucose</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dresen R., De Vuysere S., De Keyzer F. et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases // Cancer Imag. 2019. № 19:1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dresen R., De Vuysere S., De Keyzer F. et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases // Cancer Imag. 2019. № 19:1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Han S., Amant F., Michielsen K. et al. Feasibility of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study // J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2017. № 46 (6). P. 1707-1717.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Han S., Amant F., Michielsen K. et al. Feasibility of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study // J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2017. № 46 (6). P. 1707-1717.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heusner T., Kuemmel S., Koeninger A. et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging // Eur. J. of Nucl. Med. and Mol. Imag. 2010. № 6. P. 1077-1086.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heusner T., Kuemmel S., Koeninger A. et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging // Eur. J. of Nucl. Med. and Mol. Imag. 2010. № 6. P. 1077-1086.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jung N., Kim H., Jung J. et al. Restaging the axilla after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Predictive factors for residual metastatic lymph node disease with negative imaging findings // Breast J. 2019. № 25 (2). P. 196-201.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jung N., Kim H., Jung J. et al. Restaging the axilla after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Predictive factors for residual metastatic lymph node disease with negative imaging findings // Breast J. 2019. № 25 (2). P. 196-201.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kitajima K., Yamano T., Miyoshi Yu. et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to breast cancer treatment. Comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging // Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2019. № 22(1). P. 25-35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kitajima K., Yamano T., Miyoshi Yu. et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to breast cancer treatment. Comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging // Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2019. № 22(1). P. 25-35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kosmin M., Priya V., Mei-Lin A. et al. The addition of whole body magnetic resonance imaging to body computerised tomography alters treatment decisions in patients with metastatic breast cancer // Eur. J. of Cancer. № 77. P. 109-116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kosmin M., Priya V., Mei-Lin A. et al. The addition of whole body magnetic resonance imaging to body computerised tomography alters treatment decisions in patients with metastatic breast cancer // Eur. J. of Cancer. № 77. P. 109-116.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kwee T., Takahara T., Ochiai R. et al. Whole body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging // Eur. J. Radiol. 2009. № 70 (3). P. 409-417.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kwee T., Takahara T., Ochiai R. et al. Whole body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging // Eur. J. Radiol. 2009. № 70 (3). P. 409-417.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li B., Li Q., Nie W. et al. Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of primary and metastatic malignancies: a meta-analysis // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. № 83 (2). P. 338-344.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li B., Li Q., Nie W. et al. Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of primary and metastatic malignancies: a meta-analysis // Eur. J. Radiol. 2014. № 83 (2). P. 338-344.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu B., Gao S., Li S. A. Comprehensive comparison of CT, MRI, positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/CT, and diffusion weighted imaging-MRI for detecting the lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis based on 67 studies // Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2017. № 82 (3). P. 209-222.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu B., Gao S., Li S. A. Comprehensive comparison of CT, MRI, positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/CT, and diffusion weighted imaging-MRI for detecting the lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis based on 67 studies // Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2017. № 82 (3). P. 209-222.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morone M., Bali M., Tunariu N. et al. Whole body MRI: current applications in oncology // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017. № 209(6). P. 336-349.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morone M., Bali M., Tunariu N. et al. Whole body MRI: current applications in oncology // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017. № 209(6). P. 336-349.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ohno Y., Yoshikawa T., Kishida Y. et al. Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities in the assessment of distant metastasis and local recurrence of tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer // Eur. Radiol. 2018. № 28 (5). P. 1862-1874.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ohno Y., Yoshikawa T., Kishida Y. et al. Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities in the assessment of distant metastasis and local recurrence of tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer // Eur. Radiol. 2018. № 28 (5). P. 1862-1874.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Orsaria P., Chiaravalloti A., Caredda E. et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for nodal staging of breast cancer // Anticancer Res. 2018. № 38 (12). P. 6639-6652.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orsaria P., Chiaravalloti A., Caredda E. et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for nodal staging of breast cancer // Anticancer Res. 2018. № 38 (12). P. 6639-6652.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paruthikunnan S., Kadavigere R., Karegowda L. Accuracy of whole-body dwi for metastases screening in a diverse group of malignancies: comparison with conventional cross-sectional imaging and nuclear scintigraphy // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017. № 209 (3). P. 477-490.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Paruthikunnan S., Kadavigere R., Karegowda L. Accuracy of whole-body dwi for metastases screening in a diverse group of malignancies: comparison with conventional cross-sectional imaging and nuclear scintigraphy // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017. № 209 (3). P. 477-490.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rezk M., Nasr I., Ali I. et al. Comparative study between 18F FDG-PET/CT and whole body MRI DWIBS in assessment of recurrent breast cancer (prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study design // Ind. J. of Nucl. Med. 2019. № 34 (1). P. 1-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rezk M., Nasr I., Ali I. et al. Comparative study between 18F FDG-PET/CT and whole body MRI DWIBS in assessment of recurrent breast cancer (prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study design // Ind. J. of Nucl. Med. 2019. № 34 (1). P. 1-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schaarschmidt B., Buchbender C., Nensa F. et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC. with the standardized uptake value (SUV in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC. patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI // PLoS One. 2015. № 10 (1). P. 1-14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schaarschmidt B., Buchbender C., Nensa F. et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC. with the standardized uptake value (SUV in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC. patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI // PLoS One. 2015. № 10 (1). P. 1-14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shen G., Ma H., Liu B. et al. Diagnostic Performance of DWI with multiple parameters for assessment and characterization of pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis // Am. J. of Roentgenol. 2017. № 210. P. 1-10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shen G., Ma H., Liu B. et al. Diagnostic Performance of DWI with multiple parameters for assessment and characterization of pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis // Am. J. of Roentgenol. 2017. № 210. P. 1-10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xing H., Song C., Li W. Meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients: Clinical value of DWI and ADC value // Eur. J. Radiol. 2016. № 85 (60). P. 1132-1137.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xing H., Song C., Li W. Meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients: Clinical value of DWI and ADC value // Eur. J. Radiol. 2016. № 85 (60). P. 1132-1137.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
