Preview

Radiology - Practice

Advanced search

Evaluation of Effectiveness of 64- and 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (Literature Review with Their Own Clinical Observations)

Abstract

In present study were compared the technical characteristics and diagnostic performance of 64- versus 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in the detection of stenosis of coronary arteries ≥ 50 %, confirmed by conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Our study included 80 patients. In two similar populations, 256-slice CTCA displayed superior diagnostic performance than 64-slice CTCA. However, the performance of 256-slide CTCA is affected in those segments that are severely calcified and/or stented.

About the Authors

M. F. Maksudov
39, Amir Temur av., Tashkent, 600011, Uzbekistan
Russian Federation


A. I. Ikramov
Tashkent Postgraduate Medical Institute
Russian Federation


N. M. Djuraeva
State Institution «Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after academician V. Vakhidov»
Russian Federation


M. M. Zufarov
State Institution «Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after academician V. Vakhidov»
Russian Federation


N. K. Makhkamov
State Institution «Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after academician V. Vakhidov»
Russian Federation


References

1. Зяблова Е. И., Порханов В. А. Мультиспиральная компьютерная коронарография в диагностике коронарного атеросклероза // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2015. № 6. C. 53-58.

2. Корок Е. В., Сумин А. Н. Сложности в диагностике обструктивных поражений коронарных артерий: роль неинвазивных тестов // Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2019. Т. 8. № 1. С. 70-79.

3. Фуженко Е. Е., Ховрин B. В., Кулагина Т. Ю., Абугов C. А., Сандриков В. А. Оценка выраженности коронарного стеноза по данным мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии в сравнении с коронарной ангиографиeй // Диагностическая и интервенционная радиология. 2015. Т. 9. № 3. С. 25-30.

4. Andreini D., Pontone G., Bartorelli A. L. et al. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis // Am. J. Cardiol. 2009. V. 103. P. 1349-58.

5. Budoff M. J., Dowe D., Jollis J. G. et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008. V. 52. P. 1724-32.

6. Chao S. P., Law W. Y., Kuo C. J. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease // Eur. Heart J. 2010. V. 31. P. 1916-23.

7. Chua S. K., Hung H. F., Cheng J. J. et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64-versus 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease // Acta Cardiol. Sin. 2013. V. 29: P. 151-159.

8. Hou Y., Yue Y., Guo W. et al. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates // Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imag. 2012. V. 28. P. 153-162.

9. Liang J., Wang H., Hu L. et al. Diagnostic performance of 256-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with high heart rates within a single cardiac cycle: a preliminary study // Clin. Radiol. 2017. V. 72. Is. 8. P. 694.e7-694.e14.

10. Meijboom W. B., Meijs M. F., Schuijf J. D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008. V. 52. P. 2135-2144.

11. Miller J. M., Rochitte C. E., Dewey M. et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT // N. Engl. J. Med. 2008. V. 359. P. 2324-2336.

12. Sajjadieh A., Hekmatnia A., Keivani M. et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-row coronary CT angiography in detecting significant stenosis as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography // ARYA Atheroscler. 2013. V. 9. Is. 2.

13. Tariq A., Hameed S. D., Vembar M., Dharaiya E., Rydberg J. Low radiation dose ECG-gated chest CT angiography on a 256-slice multidetector CT scanner // Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009. V. 25. P. 267-278.


Review

For citations:


Maksudov M.F., Ikramov A.I., Djuraeva N.M., Zufarov M.M., Makhkamov N.K. Evaluation of Effectiveness of 64- and 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (Literature Review with Their Own Clinical Observations). Radiology - Practice. 2020;(4):27-40. (In Russ.)

Views: 300


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0118 (Online)