Preview

Radiology - Practice

Advanced search

Determination of the Anatomical Features of the Temporal Bones at the Stage of Planning Extraoral Implantation in Ectoprosthetics of the Auricle

https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2021-2-12-24

Abstract

At the present stage of the development of maxillofacial surgery, the treatment of patients with defects in the auricles is one of the most difficult. Defects of the auricles, characterized by its absence, are divided according to the etiological factor into two main groups: congenital (microtia) and acquired (as a result of injuries of various origins). Microtia (including anotia the complete absence of the auricle) is a malformation of the auricle and the external auditory canal caused by anomalies of the first and second zygomatic arch and the first sulcus.
Congenital malformations of the auricle occur in 1 out of 700–15 000 newborns and more often have a right-sided localization. In 15 % of cases, they are hereditary, and in 85 % they are sporadic, in boys they are detected on average 2–2,5 times more often than in girls.
Currently, much attention is paid to the prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle with fixation by means of cranial intraosseous implants. At the same time precise diagnostics of the state of the temporal bones in the area of the proposed implantation and the correct positioning of the intraosseous supports are the basis of an effective fixation system. Among the methods of radiological diagnostics used for planning ectoprosthetics of the auricles, radiography has long been preferred. However, the introduction of computed tomography into clinical practice has provided a high-quality assessment of the temporal bones state, which has increased the efficiency of surgical intervention planning and treatment.

About the Authors

D. A. Lezhnev
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Department of Radiology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
Russian Federation

Lezhnev Dmitriy Anatol'evich, M. D. Med., Professor, Chair of Department of Radiology; Professor, Therapeutic Dentistry Department

20/1, ul. Delegatskaya, Moscow, 127473
Phone number: +7 (495) 609-67-00

2/1, ul. Barrikadnaya, Moscow, 125993
Phone number: +7 (495) 680-05-99, доб. 900



S. D. Arutyunov
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Department of Propedeutic of Dental Diseases
Russian Federation

Arutyunov Sergey Darchoevich, M. D. Med., Professor, Head of Department of Propedeutic of Dental Diseases

12, ul. Stepana Suprina, Moscow, 125167
Phone number: +7 (926) 205-64-18



E. Yu. Lazarenko
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Department of Radiology
Russian Federation

Lazarenko Ekaterina Yur'evna, Resident of Department of Radiology

20/1, ul. Delegatskaya, Moscow, 127473
Phone number: +7 (903) 226-37-94 



M. V. Magomedbekova
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Department of Propedeutic of Dental Diseases
Russian Federation

Magomedbekova Maria Vidadievna, Laboratory Assistant of Department of Propedeutic of Dental Diseases

20/1, ul. Delegatskaya, Moscow, 127473
Phone number: +7 (906) 745-02-13 



References

1. Balyasinskaya G. L., Ryabinin A. G., Mileshina N. A. Ear malformations. Diseases of the ear, throat, nose in childhood: National guide. Ed. by Bogomil'skiy M. R., Chistyakova V. R. Moscow, 2008. P. 603–618 (in Russian).

2. Sel'skiy N. E., Korotik I. O. Choosing an extraoral implant for total facial defect. Dentistry Problems. 2017. No. 4. P. 65–69 (in Russian).

3. Chkadua T. Z., Abramyan S. V., Sukharskiy I. I. et al. Ectoprosthetics of the auricle with support on intraosseous implants in patients with grade III microtia. Dentistry. 2017. V. 96. No. 4. P. 32–35 (in Russian).

4. Cholokava T. D. Intraosseous implantation in the temporal bone area during ectoprosthetics of the auricle (clinical and experimental study). Dis. … cand. med. sci. Moscow, 2017. 152 p. (in Russian).

5. Chen Xia, Zhang Ruhong. Microtia epigenetics: An overview of review and new view point. Medicine. 2019. V. 98. Is. 41. P. e17468.

6. Cubitt J. J., Chang L. Y., Liang D. et al. Auricular reconstruction. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2019. V. 55. No. 5. P. 512– 517.

7. Gautam R., Kumar J., Pradhan G. S. et al. High-resolution computed tomography evaluation of congenital aural atresia — how useful is this? J. of Laryngology and Otology. 2020. V. 134. Is. 7. P. 610–622.

8. Luquetti D. V., Heike C. L., Hing A. V. et al. Microtia: Epidemiology and genetics. Am. J. of Med. Genetics. Part A. 2012. V. 158A. Is. 1. P. 124–139.

9. Sylva B.-F. Congenital Auricular Malformations: Description of Anomalies and Syndromes. Facial Plastic. 2015. V. 31. Is. 6. P. 567–580.

10. Vijverberg M. A., Verhamme L. et al. Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation. Eur. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology: Official Journal of the Eur. Federation of Oto-RhinoLaryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for OtoRhino-Laryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. 2019. V. 276. No. 4. P. 1017– 1027.

11. Uto S., Hikita A., Sakamoto T. et al. Ear cartilage reconstruction combining induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cartilage and three-dimensional shape-memory scaffold. Tissue Engineering. Part A. Published Online: 2. Nov. 2020.


Review

For citations:


Lezhnev D.A., Arutyunov S.D., Lazarenko E.Yu., Magomedbekova M.V. Determination of the Anatomical Features of the Temporal Bones at the Stage of Planning Extraoral Implantation in Ectoprosthetics of the Auricle. Radiology - Practice. 2021;(2):12-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2021-2-12-24

Views: 662


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0118 (Online)