Possibilities of MR-mammography in Diagnosis of Breast Reconstruction following Complex Cancer Treatment (Literature Review with Own Clinical Observations)
https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2021-3-88-102
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective method of diagnosing breast pathology due to its high resolution in the study of soft tissues and high sensitivity based on the contrast effect. There is still no consensus on the choice of the optimal method of examination of patients after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Changes in breast tissue that are associated with surgery and radiation therapy cause difficulties in interpreting mammographic and ultrasound images. MRI using a high-field tomograph (> 1 T), a specialized coil and a paramagnetic contrast agent is highly informative in the detection and differential diagnosis of recurrent formations against the background of infiltrative and scarring changes.
About the Authors
S. V. SerebryakovaRussian Federation
Serebryakova Svetlana Vladimirovna, M. D. Med., Professor of the Department of Therapy and Integrative Medicine of the Institute of Continuing Professional Education «Extreme Medicine»; Head of the MRI office of Clinic № 1
4/2, ul. Academica Lebedeva, St. Petersburg, 194044
+7 (812) 339-39-39
T. A. Shumakova
Russian Federation
Shumakova Tatyana Anatolyevna, Ph. D. Med., Associate Professor of the Department of Radiology and Radiation Medicine; Head of MRI Department, I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
3, ul. Budapeshtskaya., St-Petersburg, 192242
+7 (921) 994-54-40
E. A. Yukhno
Russian Federation
Yukhno Elena Antonovna, Ph. D. Med., Radiologist of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology of Clinic of Rentgenoradiology and Ultrasound Diagnostics
6, ul. Academica Lebedeva, St. Petersburg, 194044
+7 (812) 292-33-47
A. O. Kuckaya
Russian Federation
Kuckaya Anastasiya Olegovna, Resident of the Department of Radiology and Medical Visualization
2, ul. Akkuratova, St. Petersburg, 194044
+7 (931) 300–87–04
References
1. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Volchenko A. A., Ermoshenkova M. V. et al. Algorithm for choosing reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer. Povolzhskij onkologicheskij vestnik. 2015. Nо. 3. Р. 38–44 (in Russian).
2. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Rasskazova E. A. TRAM-flap in reconstructive operations in patients with breast cancer. Opuholi zhenskoj reproduktivnoj sistemy. 2015. Nо. 2. C. 25–30 (in Russian).
3. Kaprin A. D., Zikiryakhodzhaev A. D. Oncoplastic breast surgery. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 312 p. (in Russian).
4. Serebryakova S. V., Trufanov G. E., Fokin V. A., Yukhno E. A. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of nodular formations. 2016. Nо. 1. Р. 10–21 (in Russian).
5. Sobolevsky V. A., Ivashkov V. Yu., Mekhtieva N. I. Reconstructive plastic surgery in breast cancer. Prakticheskaya onkologiya. 2017. V. 18. No. 3. Р. 246–255 (in Russian).
6. Solodkij V. A., Sherstneva T. V., Meskih E. V., Izmajlov T. R. Reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer in the Russian Federation and abroad (comparative analysis). Vestnik Nacional’nogo medikohirurgicheskogo сentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2018. Nо. 3. P. 132–137 (in Russian).
7. ASPS procedural statistics represent procedures performed by ASPS Member Surgeons certified by the American Board of Plastic. URL: https://www.plasticsurgery.org.
8. Aydiner A., Igci A., Soran A. Breast disease. Management and Therapies. 2019. V. 2.
9. Ben Aziz M., Rose J. Breast Reconstruction Perforator Flaps. 2020. 2. Stat-Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020.
10. Chen W., Lv X., Xu X., Gao X., Wang B. Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018. V. 25 (4). Р. 464–469.
11. Cordeiro P. G., Albornoz C. R., McCormick B., Hudis C. A., Hu Q., Heerdt A., Matros E. What Is the Optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in twostage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015. Jun. V. 135 (6). Р. 1509–1517.
12. Gigli S., Amabile M. I., Di Pastena F. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging after breast oncoplastic surgery: an update. Breast Care (Basel). 2017
13. Grieco M. P., Simonacci F., Bertozzi N., Grignaffini E., Raposio E. Breast reconstruction with breast implants. Acta Biomed. 2019. Jan 15. V. 89 (4). Р. 457– 462.
14. Hartrampf C. R., Scheflan M., Black P. W. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982. Feb. V. 69 (2). Р. 216–225.
15. Koshima I., Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br. J. Plast Surg. 1989. Nov. V. 42 (6). Р. 645–648.
16. Mann R. M., Cho N., Moy L. Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology. 2019. Sep. V. 292 (3). Р. 520–536.
17. Sachs D., Winters R. Unipedicled TRAM breast reconstruction. 2020. Nov. 30. Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing. 2020.
18. Schmauss D., Machens H. G., Harder Y. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Front Surg. 2016. Jan. V. 19. Р. 2–71.
19. Sood R., Easow J. M., Konopka G., Panthaki Z. J. Latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: recent innovations in the workhorse flap. Cancer Control. 2018. Jan — Mar. V. 25 (1).
20. Yoon C. S., Kim K. N. Selective salvage of zones 2 and 4 in the pedicled TRAM flap: a focus on reducing fat necrosis and improving aesthetic outcomes. Springerplus. 2016. Jan. V. 22. Р. 5–68.
Review
For citations:
Serebryakova S.V., Shumakova T.A., Yukhno E.A., Kuckaya A.O. Possibilities of MR-mammography in Diagnosis of Breast Reconstruction following Complex Cancer Treatment (Literature Review with Own Clinical Observations). Radiology - Practice. 2021;(3):88-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2021-3-88-102