Possibilities of Digital X-Ray Tomosynthesis in the Screening Program For Women with High Mammographic Density (Literature Review with Their Own Сlinical Оbservations)
Abstract
The progressive development of X-ray technologies and the introduction of highly informative methods, which include digital X-ray tomosynthesis, significantly expands the possibilities of early diagnosis of breast diseases. X-ray tomosynthesis of the mammary gland (MF) is a modified method of digital mammography, which allows to obtain layer-by-layer sections of the mammary gland using rotation along the C-arc of an X-ray tube, which contributes to a more detailed study of the structure of the dense mammary gland (BIRADS C, D). It is advisable to use X-ray tomosynthesis as an element of personalized screening in women with mammographic density BI-RADS C and D, as well as in women with implanted mammary glands. 1,500 women with high mammographic density were examined.
About the Authors
N. V. Klimova
The Surgut State University;
The Surgut District Clinical Hospital, Department of Radiological
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. D. Belocerkovceva
The Surgut State University;
The Surgut Clinical Perinatal Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Kuznecov
Surgut State University;
Surgut Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph. D. Med., Senior lecturer, Multiprofile Clinic Training Department, Medical Institute;
Radiologist, Radiology Department,
41/2-405, ul. 30 let Pobedy, Surgut, 628406
References
1. Belocerkovceva L. D., Klimova N. V., Sarsebaeva Z. O. Possibilities of X-ray tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of breast diseases in the program of assisted reproductive technologies. Moscow: Dinastija, 2017. No. 4 (16). P. 13–16 (in Russian).
2. Beljaev A. M., Turavilova E. V. et al. Methodical recommendations for the implementation of the population screening program for malignant neoplasms of the mammary gland among the female population. Moscow: Ministerstvo zdravoohranenija Rossijskoj Federacii. 2019. P. 40 (in Russian).
3. Vasil'ev A. Yu., Pavlova T. V., Manujlova O. O. Tomosynthesis in the differential diagnosis of non-palpable mammary glands. Ucheb. posob. Moscow: «Moskovskij Gosudarstvennyj Mediko-stomatologicheskij Universitet im. A. I. Evdokimova». 2016. P. 24–25 (in Russian).
4. Vasil'ev A. Yu. Tomosynthesis. Moscow: Ikar, 2020. C. 30 (in Russian). 5. Zaharova N. A. Clinical guidelines of ROOM for breast cancer screening. N. A. Zaharova, V. F. Semiglazov, G. M. Manihas. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2018. P. 18 (in Russian).
5. Morozov S. P. Metodicheskie rekomendacii «Organization of the program of population screening of malignant neoplasms of the mammary gland among the female population». Moscow, 2020. P. 15 (in Russian).
6. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po mammologii. Pod red. A. D. Kaprina, N. I. Rozhkovoj. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. P. 17. (in Russian).
7. Rozhkova N. I., Prokopenko S. P., Mazo M. L. Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: what has changed in 20 years. Scientific and practical journal «Doctor. RU. Ginekologija Jendokrinologija». 2018. No. 2 (146). P. 35–40 (in Russian).
8. The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2017. pod red. A. D. Kaprina, V. V. Starinskogo, G. V. Petrovoj. M.: MNIOI im. P. A. Gercena, 2018. P. 236 (in Russian).
9. Suhih G. T., Ashrafjan L. A., Kuznecov I. N. Early diagnosis of the main localizations of cancer of the reproductive system in women: problems and prospects. Nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal «Doktor. Ru Ginekologija Jendokrinologija». No. 2 (146). 2018. P. 6–9 (in Russian).
10. Vaidya A. M., Chetlen A. L., Schetter S. E. Does a high-risk recommendation in mammography reports increase attendance at a breast cancer risk assessment clinic? Journal of the American College of Radiology. Elsevier. 2015. V. 12. P. 923– 929.
11. Arti R. J., Kenny Q. S., Phan T. H. Stereotactic breast biopsies: an update in the era of digital tomosynthesis. Radiol. 2018. No. 47 (9). Р. 17–20.
12. Chae E. Y., Kim H. H., Cha J. H., Shin H. J., Choi W. J. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view fullfield digital mammography. Radiol. 2016. No. 89 (1062). P. 121.
13. Gennaro G., Bernardi D., Houssami N. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: perview analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2018. No. 28 (2). P. 573–581.
14. Houssami N. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless? Cancer Biol. Med. 2017. No. 14. P. 1–8.
15. Keating N. L., Pace L. E. New guidelines for breast cancer screening in US women. JAMA. 2015. No. 314. P. 71.
16. Kim W.H., Chang J.M., Koo H.R., Seo M., Bae M.S., Lee J. et al. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Acta Radiol. 2017. No. 58 (2). P. 148–155.
17. Yaghjyan L. et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast can - cer in postmenopausal, women according to tumor characteristics. J. of the National Cancer Institute. 2011. V. 103. P. 1179– 1189.
18. McKinlay J. B. From promising report to standard procedure: seven stages in the career of a medical innovation. The Milbank Mem. Fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 1981. V. 59. No. 3. P. 374–411.
19. Mariscotti G., Durando M., Houssami N., Zuiani C., Martincich L., Londero V. et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and chacracterising invasive lobular cancer: a multi-reader study. Clin. Radiol. 2016. No. 71 (9). Р. 889–895. DOI:10.1016/j.crad 2016.04.004.
20. Engmann N. J., Golmakani M. K., Miglioretti D. L. Population-attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017. No. 3 (9). P. 1228–1237.
21. Nazari S. S., Mukherjee P. An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018. No. 25 (3). P. 259–267.
22. Phi X. A., Tagliafico A., Houssami N., Greuter M. J. W., de Bock G. H. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts — a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018. No. 18 (1). P. 380.
23. Sharma N., McMahon M., Haigh I. et al. The potential impact of digital breast tomosynthesis on the benign biopsy rate in women recalled within the uk breast screening programme. Radiol. 2019. No. 291. P. 310–317.
24. Stephen A. Feig personalized screening for breast cancer: a wolf in sheep's clothing? Am. J. of Roentgenology 2015. No. 205 (6). P. 1365–1371.
25. Stone J., Dite G. S., Gunasekara A. et. al. The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. V. 15 (4). P. 612–617.
26. Schünemann H. J., Lerda D., Quinn C. et. al. For the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Contributor Group. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: a synopsis of the european breast guidelines. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020. No. 172. P. 46–56.
27. Tagliafico A., Calabrese M., Bignotti B., Signori A., Fisci E., Rossi F., Valdora F. Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts. Eur. Radiol. 2017. No. 27 (12). Р. 5179–5184.
28. Tagliafico A. S., Francesca M., Giovanna D. et al. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts. Breast. 2018. No. 40. P. 92–96.
Review
For citations:
Klimova N.V., Belocerkovceva L.D., Kuznecov A.A. Possibilities of Digital X-Ray Tomosynthesis in the Screening Program For Women with High Mammographic Density (Literature Review with Their Own Сlinical Оbservations). Radiology - Practice. 2021;(1):64-79. (In Russ.)
Views:
382
Email this article 