Methods of Perforator Vessels Visualization in Perforator Flap Preoperative Planning (Literature Review)ive planning (Review article)
A. A. Trefilov,
E. V. Kryukov,
V. N. Troyan,
S. V. Tereshchuk,
V. A. Suharev,
I. A. Aseeva,
E. V. Gajdukova https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-4-57-69
Abstract
Preoperative detection of perforator vessels in the perforator flap planning is an actual problem in clinical practice. There are various methods to visualize the localization of perforator vessels. This review presents the main of these methods with a description of their capabilities, advantages and limitations, as well as describes the priorities for using one or another approach depending on the localization of the donor site.
About the Authors
A. A. Trefilov
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Trefilov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich, Head of the X-ray Department
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
E. V. Kryukov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kryukov Evgeny Vladimirovich, M. D. Med., Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head
6, ul. Academician Lebedev, St. Petersburg, 194044
+7 (812) 292-32-63
V. N. Troyan
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Troyan Vladimir Nikolayevich, M. D. Med., Professor, Head of the center for radiation diagnosis
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
S. V. Tereshchuk
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tereshchuk Sergej Vasil’evich, Ph. D. Med., Head of the Center for Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
V. A. Suharev
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Suharev Vladimir Aleksandrovich, Ph. D. Med., Head of the Department of Reconstructive, Microvascular, and Plastic Surgery
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
I. A. Aseeva
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aseeva Irina Anatol’evna, Ph. D. Med., Head of department, doctor of ultrasound diagnostics
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
E. V. Gajdukova
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gajdukova Elena Vladimirovna, Head of CT and Angiography Room
3, Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, 105094
+7 (499) 263-55-55
References
1. Cherednichenko N. O., Badiul P. O., Slesarenko S. V., Kulikova F. I. Features of perforating vessels visualization at the stage of preoperative planning of perforating flaps by computed tomography with angiography. Radiation Diagnostics, Radiation Therapy. 2017. No. 1 (in Russian).
2. Badiul P. O., Sliesarenko S. V. Multidetectorrow computed tomographic angiography in the planning of the local perforator flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2015. V. 22. P. e516.
3. Feng S., Min P., Grassetti L., Lazzeri D., Sadigh P., Nicoli F., Torresetti M., Gao W., di Benedetto G., Zhang W., Zhang Y. X. A prospective headtohead comparison of color Doppler ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography in the preoperative planning of lower extremity perforator flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016. V. 137. P. 335–347.
4. Heneweer C., Zirk M., Safi A., Smeets R., Malter W., Kröger N., Zöller J., Maintz D., Zinser M. An Innovative Approach for Preoperative Perforator Flap Planning Using Contrastenhanced Bflow Imaging. PRS — Global Open. 2021. V. 9. No. 5. P. e3547.
5. Hennessy O., Potter S. M. Use of infrared thermography for the assessment of free flap perforators in autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review. JPRAS Open. 2020. V. 23. P. 60–70.
6. Ibrahim R. M., Gunnarsson G. L., Akram J., Sørensen J. A., Thomsen J. B. Color Doppler ultrasonography targeted recons truction using pedicled perforator flaps — a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur. J. Plast. Surg. 2018. V. 41. No. 5. P. 495–504.
7. Kehrer A., Heidekrueger P. I., Lonic D., Taeger C. D., Klein S., Lamby P., Sachanadani N. S., Jung E. M., Prantl L., da Silva N. P. B. HighResolution UltrasoundGuided Perforator Mapping and Characterization by the Microsurgeon in Lower Limb Reconstruction. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2021. V. 37. No. 1. P. 75–82.
8. Khoong Y. M., Huang X., Gu S., Zan T. Imaging for thinned perforator flap harvest: current status and future perspectives. Burns & Trauma. 2021. V. 9. P. tkab042.
9. Li K., Zhang Z., Nicoli F., D’Ambrosia C., Xi W., Lazzeri D., Feng S., Su W., Li H., Ciudad P., Tremp M., Zhang Y. X. Application of Indocyanine Green in Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2018. V. 34. P. 77–86.
10. Martínez J. G., Pérez A. T., Vega M. G., Nuñez-Villaveiran T. Preoperative Vascular Planning of Free Flaps: Comparative Study of Computed Tomographic Angiography, Color Doppler Ultrasonography, and HandHeld Doppler. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020. V. 146. P. 227–237.
11. Ono S., Hayashi H., Ohi H., Ogawa R. Imaging Studies for Preoperative Planning of Perforator Flaps: An Overview. Clin. Plastic. Surg. 2017. V. 44. P. 21–30.
12. Orgill D. P., Atia A., Hollenbeck S. T. Local Skin Flaps for Lower Extremity Wounds. Handbook of Lower Extremity Reconstruction. 2020. P. 115–127.
13. Pereira N., Valenzuela D., Mangelsdorff G., Kufeke M., Roa R. Detection of Perforators for Free Flap Planning Using Smartphone Thermal Imaging: A Concordance Study with Computed Tomographic Angiography in 120 Perforators. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018. V. 141. No. 3. P. 787–792.
14. Renzulli M., Clemente A., Brocchi S., Gelati C., Zanotti S., Pizzi C., Tassone D., Cappabianca S., Cipriani R., Golfieri R. Preoperative computed tomography assessment for a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: a new easy technique from the Bologna experience. Acta. Radiol. 2021. V. 62. No. 10. P. 1283–1289.
15. Rozen W. M., Stella D. L., Bowden J., Taylor G. I., Ashton M. W. Advances in the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: magnetic resonance angiography. Microsurgery. 2009. V. 29. No. 2. P. 119–123.
16. Schiltz D., Lenhard J., Klein S., Anker A., Lonic D., Heidekrueger P. I., Prantl L., Jung E.-M., Da Silva N. P. B., Kehrer A. DoIt-Yourself Preoperative HighResolution UltrasoundGuided Flap Design of the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap (SCIP). J. Clin. Med. 2021. V. 10. P. 2427.
17. Soliman H. H., Abozeid M. F., Moustafa M. A. Efficacy of perforator CTA of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in preoperative planning of breast reconstruction: comparative study with CDUS. EJRNM. 2020. V. 51. Р. 1–8.
18. Van Den Hoven P., Verduijn P. S., Van Capelle L., Tange F. P., Michi M., Corion L. U. M., Sibinga Mulder B. G., Mureau M. A. M., Vahrmeijer A. L., Van Der Vorst J. R. Quantification of nearinfrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in free flap breast reconstruction. JPRAS. 2022.
19. Visconti G., Bianchi A., Hayashi A., Cina A., Maccauro G., Almadori G., Salgarello M. Thin and superthin perforator flap elevation based on preoperative planning with ultrahighfrequency ultrasound. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2020. V. 47. No. 4. P. 365–370.
20. Yang S. F., Wang C. M., Ono S., Xu W., Xu K.-Y., Pu L. L. Q. The value of multidetector row computed tomography angiography for preoperative planning of freestyle pedicled perforator flaps. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2016. V. 77. No. 6. P. 669–673.
Review
For citations:
Trefilov A.A., Kryukov E.V., Troyan V.N., Tereshchuk S.V., Suharev V.A., Aseeva I.A., Gajdukova E.V. Methods of Perforator Vessels Visualization in Perforator Flap Preoperative Planning (Literature Review)ive planning (Review article). Radiology - Practice. 2022;(4):57-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-4-57-69
Views:
363
Email this article 