Diagnostic Algorithm for Examination of Patients with Limb Shortening and Deformity before, during and after Treatment to Study Bone Quality
Abstract
Radiography, Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were used to examine 168 patients with lower limb shortening, bone deformity at different stages of limb lengthening using transosseous distraction osteosynthesis with the Ilizarov apparatus. Based on the findings an algorithm for examination of patients with limb shortening and deformity was improved and added at different stages of treatment. The algorithm must include standard polypositional radiography with data processing if needed, using software for quantitative assessment of optical density, updated MSCT and MRI techniques. Indications for MSCT were preoperative measurement of bone density, evidently impaired architectonics; and delayed consolidation, cysts and areas of low density in the regenerate bone during treatment. MRI should be produced after removal of the frame in patients with lengthy fixation period, with the purpose of assessing degree of bone restructuring at the distractional regenerate bone and quality of new bone to plan a programme of rehabilitation.
About the Authors
Konstantin A. D’achkovRussian Federation
Ph. D. Med., Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Radiological and Ultrasound Diagnostic
Galina V. D’achkova
Russian Federation
M. D. Med., Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Radiological and Ultrasound Diagnostic
Anna M. Aranovich
Russian Federation
M. D. Med., Head Trauma and Orthopedics Department № 17
Tat’yana A. Larionova
Russian Federation
Ph. D. Med., Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Radiological and Ultrasound Diagnostic
Aleksandr Yu. Vasil’ev
Russian Federation
M. D. Med., Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of Department of Radiology
References
1. Aranovich A. M., D’yachkova G. V., Klimov O. V., Neretin A. S. The techniques of digital analysis of X-ray picture of distraction regenerated bone in the process of leg lengthening in patients with achondroplasia. Fundam. Issl. 2015. № 1. S. 1115–1119 (in Russian).
2. Vasil’ev A. Yu., Boychak D. V., Petrovskaya V. V., Potrakhov N.N., Gryaznov A. Yu., Potrakhov E. N., Goryunov S. V. Littledose microfocal computed radiography in diagnosing bone tissue changes for different diseases. Biotekhnosfera. 2011. No. 6. P. 39–43 (in Russian).
3. Denisova R. B., Egorova E. A. Algorithm of radiation examination of patients with the hip pathology before and after arthroplasty. Innovation approaches in Radiation diagnosis: Materials of scientific-practical conference on radiation diagnosis. Erevan, 2008. P. 38–39 (in Russian).
4. D’yachkov K. A., D’yachkova G. V., Onipko K. N. Roentgenomorphological manifestations of reparative process for correcting deformities of the hand metacarpal bones and phalanges using transosseous osteosynthesis. Genij Ortop. 2014. No. 2. P. 52–55 (in Russian).
5. D’yachkov K. A., D’yachkova G. V. Bone remodeling in limb lengthening: quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Zhurn. Klinich. and Eksperiment. Ortopedii im. G. A. Ilizarova (Genij Ortopedii). 2015. No. 4. P. 53–60 (in Russian).
6. D’yachkov K. A., Korabel’nikov M. A., D’yachkova G. V., Aranovich A. M., Klimov O. V. MRI-semiotics of distraction regenerated bone // Med. vizualizatsiya. 2011. No. 5. P. 99–103 (in Russian).
7. Radiation diagnosis of bone and joint diseases. National guide on radiation diagnosis and therapy. Eds. A. K. Morozov, S. K. Ternovoy. M., 2016. 832 p. (in Russian).
8. Mikhaylov I. N., Lebedinskiy V. Yu., Puseva M. E., Seliverstov P. V., Lepekhova S. A. Studying the distraction regenerated bone of the forearm bones with scintigraphy experimentally. Med. vizualizatsiya. 2014. No. 4. P. 114–121 (in Russian).
9. Puseva M. E., Lebedinskiy V. Yu., Mikhaylov I. N. Complex characteristic of forearm distraction regenerated bone experimentally. Genij оrtop. 2013. No. 4. P. 84–90 (in Russian).
10. Eski M., Ilgan S., Cil Yu., Sengezer M., Ozcan A., Yapici K. Assessment of distraction regenerate using quantitative bone scintigraphy // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2007. V. 58. № 3. P. 328–334.
11. Giannikas K. A., Bayam L., Naraen A., Buckley J., Maganaris C., Wilkes R. A., Hutchinson C. E. Cross-sectional anatomy in postdistraction osteogenesis tibia // J. Orthop. Sci. 2007. V. 12. № 5. P. 430–436.
12. Gubin A. V., Borzunov D. Y., Malkova T. A. The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research // Int. Orthop. 2013. V. 37. №. 8. P. 1533–1539.
13. Hamdy R. C., Rendon J. S., Tabrizian M. Distraction osteogenesis and its challenges in bone regeneration // Bone Regeneration. Ch. 8 // Ed. by H. Tal. Rijeka, Croatia: In Tech, 2012. P. 185–212.
14. Novikov K. I., Subramanyam K. N., Muradisinov S. O., Novikova O. S., Kolesnikova E. S. Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. V. 472. № 11. P. 3549–3556.
15. Sabharwal S., Nelson S. C., Sontich J. K. What’s new in limb lengthening and deformity correction. // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015. V. 97. № 16. P. 1375–1384.
Review
For citations:
D’achkov K., D’achkova G., Aranovich A., Larionova T., Vasil’ev A. Diagnostic Algorithm for Examination of Patients with Limb Shortening and Deformity before, during and after Treatment to Study Bone Quality. Radiology - Practice. 2016;(4):8-18. (In Russ.)