X-ray Pattern of Delayed Complications after Antireflux Surgery
Abstract
Aim — clarify the range of radiographic signs of delayed complications after different types of antireflux surgery (ARS) X-ray examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT). In 2013–2015 examined 67 patients who applied to the MCSC complaints after different types of ARS, conducted in medical institutions of the Russian Federation and countries in a period of 6 months to 5 years and the purpose of correction of complications ARS. The most frequent complications for each ARS were revealed. Inappropriate surgery procedures performed because of incomplete or incorrect preoperative diagnosis verification. In patients with identical complaints, after the different types of ARS, defined a wide range of radiological signs characteristic of each of the complications. X-ray examination of UGT is one of the main radiological techniques to identify complications. The main X-ray patterns of ARS complication are gastric wrap migration and gastric motility disorder.
About the Authors
Mikhail V. Pavlov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare
Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Radiologist, Radiology Department
Natalija V. Orlova
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare
Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Radiology Department
Adhamzhon B. Abduraimov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare
Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
М. D. Med., Head of Mammology Development Project, Deputy Director
Konstantin A. Les’ko
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare
Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph. D. Med., Senior Researcher, Department of Radiological Techniques of Diagnosis and Treatment, Head of Educational and Scientific Department
Julija V. Kulezneva
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare
Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
М. D. Med., Head of Radiological Techniques of Diagnosis and Treatment
References
1. Vasnev O. S., Ul’janov D. N. Reconstruction cardioesophageal surgery: esophagus. Difficult rare diagnosis and interventions in gastroenterology. V. 1. Ch. 3. Moscow: Medpraktika, 2012. P. 25–31 (in Russian).
2. Chernousov A. F., Horobryh Т. V., Vetshev F. P. Repeated antireflux surgery. Vestnik hirurgicheskoj gastrojenterologii. 2011. No. 3. P. 4–14 (in Russian).
3. Braghetto I., Korn O., Csendes A., Valladares H., Davanzo C., Debandi A. Radiologic and endoscopic characteristics of laparoscopic antireflux wrap: correlation with outcome // Int. Surg. 2012. V. 97. № 3. P. 189–197.
4. Carbo A. I., Kim R. H., Gates T., D’Agostino H. R. Imaging findings of successful and failed fundoplication // Radiographics. 2014. V. 34. № 7. Р. 1873–1884.
5. Morais D. J., Lopes L. R., Andreollo N. A. Dysphagia after antireflux fundoplication: endoscopic, radiological and manometric evaluation // Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. 2014. V. 27. № 4. Р. 251–255.
6. Raeside M. C., Madigan D., Myers J. C., Devitt P. G., Jamieson G. G., Thompson S. K. Post-fundoplication contrast studies: is there room for improvement? // The Br. J. of Radiol. 2012. V. 85. P. 792–799.
7. Tian Z. C., Wang B., Shan C. X., Zhang W., Jiang D. Z., Qiu M. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare long-term outcomes of Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease // PLoS One. 2015. V. 10. № 6. P. 1–15.
8. Wang Yu. R., Dempsey D. T., Richter J. E. Trends and perioperative outcomes of inpatient antireflux surgery in the United States, 1993–2006 // Dis. Esophagus. 2011. V. 24. № 4. P. 215–223.
Review
For citations:
Pavlov M., Orlova N., Abduraimov A., Les’ko K., Kulezneva J. X-ray Pattern of Delayed Complications after Antireflux Surgery. Radiology - Practice. 2016;(6):29-41. (In Russ.)
Views:
88
Email this article 