Preview

Radiology - Practice

Advanced search

Comparative Analysis of Tomosynthesis and Standard Digital Radiography in Spinal Research in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

The article discusses the application of the tomosynthesis techniques in the study of the spine pathology. The authors examined 89 patients from 4 to 18 years with different pathologies of the cervical thoracic and lumbosacral spine that was allocated in 3 groups. All patients had done standard digital radiography in 2 projections and tomosynthesis in one projection. The study produced on X-ray machine FDR AcSelerate 200 (Fujifilm, Japan). The authors concluded that the tomosynthesis is superior to standard digital radiography by sensitivity, accuracy, specificity and predictability of a positive and a negative result. Tomosynthesis produces a plurality of bundle images without summation effect, overcoming that limitation better visualized the ratio in the segment C1–C2 small sharpening the vertebrae in the thoracic spine, spondylolysis arcs vertebrae in the lumbosacral region. Thus, tomosynthesis may be recommended as a method of choice for studying the pathology of the spine.

About the Authors

Aleksandr Yu. Vasil’ev
Moscow State Medical University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation

M. D. Med., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of Department of Radiology



Vladimir V. Popov
Moscow Clinical Municipal Children Hospital St. Vladimir, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

M. D. Med., Professor, Head Physician



Sergey S. Karpov
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation

Postgraduate of Department of Radiology



References

1. Egorova E. A. Diagnostic radiology in osteology. Study guide for physicians and medical students. Moscow, 2015. P. 556 (in Russian).

2. Solodkij V. A., Rozhkova N. I., Mazo M. L. The latest technology in the diagnosis of breast diseases. JeF. Onkology, gematology i radiology. 2012. No. 4. P. 8–11 (in Russian).

3. Karpov S. S. Prospects of using tomosynthesis orthopedics in children and adolescents. Sbornik materialov XXXVIII Itogovoj nauchnoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh MGMSU im. A. I. Evdokimova. Pod obshhey redakciey E. A. Vol'skoy, A. G. Malyavina MGMSU. Moscow, 2016. P. 155–157 (in Russian).

4. Baranov V. A. Nonlinear structural and orientirvannye image processing techniques for non-destructive testing. Dis. … dokt. tehn. nauk. Tomsk, 2014. P. 176–177 (in Russian).

5. Iwama M., Takehara K., Anraku K. Use of tomosynthesis in the Aizawa Hospital. Medical Now. 2013. No. 75. P. 20.

6. Zahmatova T. V. Analysis of information about clinical and radiographic diagnostics of damage and degenerative diseases of the cervical spine (review). Radiologiya

7. — praktikа. 2016. No. 4 (58). P. 31 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Vasil’ev A., Popov V., Karpov S. Comparative Analysis of Tomosynthesis and Standard Digital Radiography in Spinal Research in Children and Adolescents. Radiology - Practice. 2017;(3):6-15. (In Russ.)

Views: 81


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0118 (Online)